Large Valve small chamber
If valves were to have 100% effenicy, both valves would preform the same and the larger 2" valve would be a waste. Although valves are a lot lower on any terms of effeincy. So essentially the higher flow compensates for the lack in effeincy. Catch my drift? Hopefully that made sense.
- frankrede
- Sergeant Major 2

- Posts: 3220
- Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:47 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Ok thanks.
So it would have better performance. I wasn't sure because i though that the air going to the large valve then going to the small barrle might mess something up.
So it would have better performance. I wasn't sure because i though that the air going to the large valve then going to the small barrle might mess something up.
Current project: Afghanistan deployment
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
You *probably* won't notice any benefit to using a 2" valve instead of a 1.5" valve; a 1.5" valve is already providing as much flow as the 1" pipe can handle. (or pretty close, anyways)
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 5 Replies
- 1904 Views
-
Last post by WOW!!
-
- 4 Replies
- 3030 Views
-
Last post by jackssmirkingrevenge
-
- 15 Replies
- 2759 Views
-
Last post by DYI
-
- 5 Replies
- 1296 Views
-
Last post by frankrede
-
- 14 Replies
- 5549 Views
-
Last post by Technician1002

