jam jar jet from pvc cement can

Meaningful discussion outside of the potato gun realm. Projects, theories, current events.
User avatar
thespeedycicada
Specialist 4
Specialist 4
Posts: 429
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:28 am

the primer can would work but it may only last a short amount of time like the glass one but with no breaking of the glass.The reason for this is that metal conducts heat very well which disrupts the cycle (hot gas and air blown out,some of the flame and air sucked in alchohol fumes ignite and so on) If you like pulse jets try making a real one you can make a simple lockwood hiller type like i did with steel pipe from the hardware store its very loud and produces quite a bit of thrust using propane as the fuel then make a reed valved one to get serious thrust.By the way the proper name for the jam jar jet is a ryenst pot (after who created it) Well at least thats what they call it here. http://www.pulse-jets.com/
User avatar
jimmy101
Sergeant Major 2
Sergeant Major 2
United States of America
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

Insomniac wrote:...If sucking air generated any appreciable thrust, harrier jump jets wouldn't work because the intakes still face foward while the outlets pivot, which would cause the jet to go flying foward while trying to hover.
A harrier does indeed drift forward because of the thrust generated at the air intakes. To offset that thrust the engine outlets are pointed forward slightly when the pilot wants to hover in place.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Sucking air into the engine has to create thrust. How much thrusts depends largely on the diameter of the intake, but since the intake is not gigantic, the thrust from the intakes is significant.
Image
User avatar
Insomniac
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Australia

Yes, but think of this. If the sucking air was equal to the thrust, then it would be impossible to hover, because the exhaust pipes would need to face the same way as the intakes. Heres how I'm guessing it works.

With the outlets, most of the gas goes straight out the back of the engine, and very little blows sideways, because of the momentum of the air. On the intakes however, there is a vacuum pulling air from all directions, inculding the air to the side of the intake, which means very little thrust is generated.

Also, try this. Get a bendy straw, and bend it at a 90 degree angle. Put the long end in your mouth and blow. The straw will try and move sideways. However, if you suck on the straw no noticeable thrust is generated.

Here's a pic of what I think happens with an intake compared to an outlet.
Attachments
intake.JPG
intake.JPG (22.68 KiB) Viewed 2587 times
I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges.
Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've forgotten this before.

Add me on msn!!! insomniac-55@hotmail.com
User avatar
meatballs
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:39 pm
Location: my house

i like that insomniac, thats a cool way to look at it. if i did use a primer can does anyone have any idea what size hole i should use? and whats a good way to get the brushy thing off the cap? i can break most off with pliers, but the part thats coiled flat against the cap is annoying, i can't get it with pliers. and it doesn't respond to solvents (surprise surprise) so what should i do?
User avatar
Insomniac
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Australia

I dunno. I tried making one of these a while ago by getting a tin can, drilling a hole in the top and emptying all the stuff inside out, rinsing it and then putting a little methylated spirits in the bottom and lighting it. I tried to get it to work for ages, but somthing just wasn't right. I even got it to go psssht! when it ignited, but it just wouln't start to cycle. Dunno what was wrong, but I'm guessing it was the fuel not evaporating quick enough, or the combustion not generating a strong enough vacuum.
I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges.
Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've forgotten this before.

Add me on msn!!! insomniac-55@hotmail.com
User avatar
jimmy101
Sergeant Major 2
Sergeant Major 2
United States of America
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

Insomniac: You've got the basic idea but the difference in thrust is based on the difference in velocity of the two air flows.

The air intake is usually larger than the exhaust (but it doesn't have to be).
The air intake speed is slower than the exhaust speed, as a result the density of the intake and exhaust gases is different (exhaust has lower density).
The force created by the two thrusts are proportional to the square of the flow velocities. (Mass would normally be in the force equation as well but all the mass that enters the engine also exits so mass cancels. Well almost, there is a small amount of additional mass exiting because of the injected fuel but that is a very small percentage of the total mass.)

Result, it is possible to get net thrust even if the intake and exhaust are pointing in the same direction. (Of course, you get more thurst if the two vectors are working together instead of against each other.)
Image
User avatar
ALIHISGREAT
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: UK

Also, try this. Get a bendy straw, and bend it at a 90 degree angle. Put the long end in your mouth and blow. The straw will try and move sideways. However, if you suck on the straw no noticeable thrust is generated.
yes but a straw would not have much of an effect, but a huge rolls-royce pegasus engine that sucks in ridiculous amounts of air would have an effect, but it still wouldn't be much "thrust". i think it would work kinda like a propeller does on an airplane.
User avatar
paaiyan
First Sergeant
First Sergeant
Posts: 2140
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Central Oklahoma
Been thanked: 1 time

ALIHISGREAT wrote:
Also, try this. Get a bendy straw, and bend it at a 90 degree angle. Put the long end in your mouth and blow. The straw will try and move sideways. However, if you suck on the straw no noticeable thrust is generated.
yes but a straw would not have much of an effect, but a huge rolls-royce pegasus engine that sucks in ridiculous amounts of air would have an effect, but it still wouldn't be much "thrust". i think it would work kinda like a propeller does on an airplane.
I may be mistaken, but I believe that humans can exhale air with more force than they can take it in.
"Who ever said the pen was mightier than the sword, obviously, never encountered automatic weapons."
-General Douglass MacArthur

Read my dog's blog - Life of Kilo
User avatar
ALIHISGREAT
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: UK

paaiyan wrote:
ALIHISGREAT wrote:
Also, try this. Get a bendy straw, and bend it at a 90 degree angle. Put the long end in your mouth and blow. The straw will try and move sideways. However, if you suck on the straw no noticeable thrust is generated.
yes but a straw would not have much of an effect, but a huge rolls-royce pegasus engine that sucks in ridiculous amounts of air would have an effect, but it still wouldn't be much "thrust". i think it would work kinda like a propeller does on an airplane.
I may be mistaken, but I believe that humans can exhale air with more force than they can take it in.
oh yer didn't think of that :thumbup:
User avatar
Insomniac
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Australia

Yeah, but even blowing very gently generates more thrust than inhaling as hard as possible. And with aircraft props, intake and exaust are so close together its hard to tell the difference between which is making more thrust, because when you think about it, where on the prop blade is it counted as intake, and where is it counted as exhaust?
I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges.
Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've forgotten this before.

Add me on msn!!! insomniac-55@hotmail.com
User avatar
meatballs
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:39 pm
Location: my house

ok how about this. imagine a shop vac that can blow as well as suck. if you put the shop vac on the vacuum setting then you dont feel the hose being pulled foreward. but if you have the thing blow then you can feel the hose pushing back against your hands.

blowing creates more thrust than sucking.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • Cement molds and making cement slugs
    by gwoloshyn » » in Ammo & Materials
    18 Replies
    8177 Views
    Last post by windshrike
  • PVC Cement
    by chisox21 » » in Ammo & Materials
    3 Replies
    1798 Views
    Last post by Jared Haehnel
  • About pvc cement...
    by Pax » » in Combustion Cannons
    1 Replies
    1356 Views
    Last post by jrrdw
  • PVC cement??
    by -BIGBEAR- » » in Ammo & Materials
    25 Replies
    9279 Views
    Last post by Intel Xeon
  • PVC cement
    by YEAHADD16 » » in Ammo & Materials
    34 Replies
    14104 Views
    Last post by c11man