square chamber?
- ShowNoMercy
- Sergeant

- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:08 am
- Location: Jersey Bitches!
It would work but I would be worried about the recoil from firing a heavy object all being directed against the one lone piece of pipe connecting the base to the barrel. I had a 2inch elbow blow up when I fired a heavy load of nails out of my cannon so thats my two cents.
Jesus saves, no need to pray
The gates of pearl have turned to gold
It seems you've lost your way
The gates of pearl have turned to gold
It seems you've lost your way
-
PVC Arsenal 17
- Staff Sergeant 3

- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: United States
On the money.ShowNoMercy wrote:It would work but I would be worried about the recoil from firing a heavy object all being directed against the one lone piece of pipe connecting the base to the barrel. I had a 2inch elbow blow up when I fired a heavy load of nails out of my cannon so thats my two cents.
You should always make an effort to minimize stress on the pressurized parts. It would look good, but probably not the best thing to do.
When Eugene Stoner designed the m16, he first took note of the problems the m14 had due to its shape. The m14's stock was below the barrel to improve the ease of aiming, but at the same time, the recoil of the rifle then caused the whole thing to pivot because of how the stock would transfer the recoil. He took note of this and put the stock of the m16 inline with the barrel to directly transfer the recoil and prevent pivoting. He then just raised the sight to fix to put it line with the shooter's eye.
I believe this video describes that:
Apply this same concept to your spud gun. You want to try to eliminate the pivoting effect which would put stress on the elbow/tee connecting the chamber to the barrel. Make sure the recoil will be absorbed directly and there will be no stress that could lead to failure.
ok thanks a lot. I looked at the parts for it today. and i didn't realize that a 4in elbow is 9 dollars. the only guns have have had to buy parts for were 2 inch and 1/2inch and they are pretty cheap.
I am going to redesign it a little.
thanks pat
I am going to redesign it a little.
thanks pat
If you give it a it more barrel support it should be fine.
What program are you using to draw those up?
What program are you using to draw those up?
Poo.
- Hailfire753
- Specialist 3

- Posts: 348
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:50 pm
- Location: Near Philadelphia, PA
Yeah, you are gona want to support the barrel better. BTW, what did you use to make the diagram?
UPDATED MARCH '08
field-legal paintball semi
field-legal paintball semi
I got the program off of cannoncreators site in the downloads section
- Infernal Maveric
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 220
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:41 pm
My first copper pnuematic had a square chamber http://www.maj.com/gallery/Infernal-Mav ... /spud3.jpg
But I have heard of the joining T exploding because of the stress. You would need some pretty heavy duty supports to the barrel to keep it in place when fireing
But I have heard of the joining T exploding because of the stress. You would need some pretty heavy duty supports to the barrel to keep it in place when fireing
Why would this have any more stress then the mega launcher or the SWAT gun it is basically the same except for the chambers connect
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 9 Replies
- 2310 Views
-
Last post by pvcmaster
-
- 2 Replies
- 1813 Views
-
Last post by saladtossser
-
- 0 Replies
- 2065 Views
-
Last post by alex bennett
-
- 15 Replies
- 2885 Views
-
Last post by hi
-
- 10 Replies
- 3236 Views
-
Last post by MrCrowley



