If anyone can lend me a hand on this that would be very helpfull.
Thanks!!
Stephen


hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life


Let's say you make the barrel out of 5 feet of 2.5" pipe. If you make the chamber out of the same pipe and have it at least 15 inches long you'll be fine. That would be the minimum though, if you're pressurising it using a compressor then go ahead and make the chamber the same volume as the barrel. Make sure all your pipe and fittings are pressure rated to stay safe.halfsquelch wrote:I meant about the optimal length of the barrel is that eventualy the tennis ball will stop in the barrel if it is to long. But I can't go much over 4 - 5 ft so that wont be a problem.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life


Almost.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:There is no "maxium range" - the longer your barrel, the further it will go, simple is that (provided your ratio of barrel to chamber volume doesn't fall below 4:1 or so) - so basically, make it as long as you can afford.


Hence why I did not specify a fixed chamber size in my examplejimmy101 wrote:Almost.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:There is no "maxium range" - the longer your barrel, the further it will go, simple is that (provided your ratio of barrel to chamber volume doesn't fall below 4:1 or so) - so basically, make it as long as you can afford.
There is both a maximum range and an optimal barrel length for a fixed chamber size for a pneumatic gun. (See attached GGDT output)
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life



punching in some numbers, for a theoretical launcher at 150 psi firing 60 gram tennis balls with a 5 foot barrel:halfsquelch wrote:OK one more question, would it be beneficial to have the volume of the chamber larger than the volume of the barrel?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life


dumb question... how did you figure out how far this would go?To give you an idea of what I meant, I ran a GGDT on a plan I drew up for a potential future project. Shooting a one pound tennis ball out of a 8 foot 2.5 inch barrel with 5 foot 3 inch chamber at 160 psi with helium gas, I can expect somewhere around 3,212.2 ft lbs of muzzle energy. Thats more than a ton and a half. I couldn't even hold on to that, and I am a big guy. (But I also could get around 1900 feet of range which is a little over 6 football fields)

hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
If I'm right, then muzzle energy isn't the only contributing factor to recoil. There are (very) big game rifles in .535 and .700 calibre that have over 11 000 ft/lbs of muzzle energy and no recoil absorption, and a skilled shooter can fire them standing up (and remain in that position afterwards with a bit of luck). In comparison, the recoil on my burst disk gun (currently delayed) has destroyed many things, and kicks its new 100 pound fixed stand back significantly on every shot. If you tried to shoulder fire that thing, you'd have no shoulder left to speak of afterwards.3,212.2 ft lbs of muzzle energy. Thats more than a ton and a half. I couldn't even hold on to that, and I am a big guy
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute