Bringing "Pyrotechnic" science to SF

Voice your input! Discuss anything to do with SpudFiles.com or community it's self. Constructive discussions only. This is a place to express thoughts about making the community better.

<t>Should "Pyrotechnics" be brought to the SpudFiles Forum if used safely with ceratin restrictions?</t>

Yes
8
20%
no
33
80%
 
Total votes: 41
User avatar
paaiyan
First Sergeant
First Sergeant
Posts: 2140
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Central Oklahoma
Been thanked: 1 time

Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:04 am

So I'm gonna have to vote this one a no. Although I am somewhat interested in pyrotechnics, such as smoke bombs for paintball, I don't think it belongs here. A while back, someone posted a video of a guy looking down the barrel of his cannon because it wasn't firing. We've heard a couple horror stories about people doing stupid things with their cannons, like frog boy. My point is, people do incredibly stupid things with cannons as it is and get hurt, we don't need to give them another tool.
"Who ever said the pen was mightier than the sword, obviously, never encountered automatic weapons."
-General Douglass MacArthur

Read my dog's blog - Life of Kilo
User avatar
mega_swordman
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 526
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:37 pm
Location: Bay Area, California
Contact:

Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:11 pm

jrrdw wrote:
cdheller wrote: Quote:
ok, sure i understand people dont like n00b's asking stupid questions but complaing that i dont capitalize my i's, thats just pathetic.

Wrong! You're pathetic to come here and tell us how to behave! You could call it a privilege not to have been bannend on sight for your laziness anyway, and now you have the audacity... I'm wasting my time. Banned .

I vote No. Same reasons
Bring your "A" game to roguesci.org,
Who was that directed at? Me, because if it was, you missed my point entirely. I'm not lazy either, anything but. I told no one how to behave either. I merely stated the facts. Unless your a member over there, you wouldn't know anyway. Whats up with this rant???
Judging from MrCrowley's response, he is merely re-iterating a post from rougesci. The comment isn't pointed towards you or anyone.
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." George S. Patton
User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10078
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Been thanked: 3 times

Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:14 pm

mega_swordman is correct.

It's from a topic in the banned section over at rogue.
User avatar
DYI
First Sergeant 5
First Sergeant 5
Antigua & Barbuda
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Here and there

Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:37 pm

I think I'll probably wait to post the 30x handheld hybrid on Roguesci. At only 48" long, and with about half the power of a 30-06, it would be significantly more impressive than a cannon the size of a small building that takes loads of time to set up and fire. Of course, the handheld hybrid is currently competing with the plasma gun for funding, as either project could get rather expensive (read ~$1k for the finished product).

_Fnord was right when he said that pyrotechnics will be allowed on Spudfiles the day that the government stops trying to protect people from natural selection. I couldn't have put it any better myself.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10078
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Been thanked: 3 times

Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:09 pm

Just post your burst disk cannon, at least they will get to know you a bit
more and see that you are pretty damn smart and not some 'noob'.

It wont do any harm.
User avatar
ALIHISGREAT
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: UK

Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:40 pm

and not some 'noob'
i went on it to see what all the fuss was about and that stupid noob post montering is silly, they were saying it might takes weeks for a post to come through :shock: but if they want to waste their time editing noob posts i reckon all of the spudfiles members should join up and post as much as possible :lol:
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:28 pm

Quite simply, No, there are too many dips***s that would do something and get blown to smithereens, then spudfiles gets the bad rap. If you just search google for Ryan Meerdink, you will see all kinds of news articles about someone who as far as we can tell used smokeless power in PVC.

I indulge in a few bits of "destructive chemistry", but I'm always careful about it. I'm possibly one of the safest people on this forum - I know a lot of people don't use eye or ear protection, I never fail to do so.

Fortunately, chemistry requires some brain power to do, so people aren't blowing themselves up left, right and centre.
Spudguns don't require so many brains, and if you put information about pyro on this site then you'll get people looking at it, copying and then making Mr Meerdink's mistake.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
SpudUke5
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1099
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:16 pm

Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:01 pm

Man, reading that article for the second time (the article that was mentioned on this website) makes me want to punch a reporter.

They dont know s**t when it comes to creating one and making a spudgun. Damn sensationalism. Why dont we just ban guns in general?

Moral: Stupid people, do stupid s**t.
4SPC, My 4" piston 3" porting cannon
Memo:
Fix up copper cannon
Fix up 4SPC
Start Stirrup pump
Start Toolies piston bazooka
User avatar
CannonCreator
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 314
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Moorpark, CA
Contact:

Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:30 pm

Well if anyone wants to join a fireworks pyro forum help me start mine up and join.

http://pyronatio ... tion.com/
Spudding Is dangerous, I learned the hard way:
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/my-eye- ... 15301.html

Guns. As They may Claim lives, they are lives. Our lives.

When Life gives you lemons, through them at somone.

Live, Breathe, Eat, Paintball
User avatar
Hotwired
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:51 am
Location: UK

Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:01 pm

Do you really want a section where on a semi-daily basis, persons of suspect age and maturity ask in equally suspect english how to make smoke/propulsive/explosive mixtures and compounds?

Plus of course it'll cause the site to be flagged as even higher risk than before and will be more likely to have it blocked by various public and private groups filters.

Voted No.
User avatar
mega_swordman
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 526
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:37 pm
Location: Bay Area, California
Contact:

Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:15 pm

Ragnarok wrote:If you just search google for Ryan Meerdink, you will see all kinds of news articles about someone who as far as we can tell used smokeless power in PVC.
For the lazy people, here is the article: http://www.ksfy.com/news/local/9523117.html
Hotwired wrote:ask in equally suspect english
Very nice. That made me smile.
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." George S. Patton
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:16 pm

LikimysCrotchus5 wrote:They dont know s**t when it comes to creating one and making a spudgun. Damn sensationalism. Why dont we just ban guns in general?
Unfortunately, a lot of people "don't know s**t when it comes to creating spudgun", even the people who have made them. And Ryan himself was one of those lots of people unfortunately.

It's because of those half-wits who don't follow basic safety that I cannot agree to pyro and spudguns being mixed. The ultimate decision is of course PCGUY's and I can't see him changing his previous rules, especially if 80% of people agree with them.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
jrrdw
Moderator
Moderator
United States of America
Posts: 6572
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Maryland
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 22 times
Contact:

Donating Members

Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:30 am

Ragnarok wrote:
LikimysCrotchus5 wrote:They dont know s**t when it comes to creating one and making a spudgun. Damn sensationalism. Why dont we just ban guns in general?
Unfortunately, a lot of people "don't know s**t when it comes to creating spudgun", even the people who have made them. And Ryan himself was one of those lots of people unfortunately.

It's because of those half-wits who don't follow basic safety that I cannot agree to pyro and spudguns being mixed. The ultimate decision is of course PCGUY's and I can't see him changing his previous rules, especially if 80% of people agree with them.
Very good point to point out. At time of this post 25 against, 7 for. As much as I like hearing and seeing the 'bang', I still feel theres no place here for pyrotecnics.
User avatar
Hubb
First Sergeant 2
First Sergeant 2
Posts: 2390
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 8:39 am
Location: South Georgia
Contact:

Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:50 am

Another "NO." I, as well as everyone else, like the "boom" but there is a time and place for it, and this is neither.
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:50 am

Well, unless we suddenly get a lot of people who turn up then vote "Yes", which is very unlikely, and PCGUY can be swayed by that, then I think things are staying as they are.

You need to remember that if anyone learns anything dangerous from the site and it goes wrong, it's PCGUY that will have to handle any legal messes, and he's already risking enough of those with just a spudgun site - asking him to host information on pyro as well is too much.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
Post Reply