This is version 2 of the 4.5mm Repeater Hybrid HERE which I think answers a lot of the crits. The main one was about the spring rate, and the pressure that it would have to hold back. To this end, I plan two things.
First of all, more room for the spring. More room, means a bigger spring, which means I can get a stronger spring, it means too, that I'll only use a small fraction of its travel which means the spring rate is more even. I'm looking at either a) the spring from an MTB front fork or b) an air-rifle spring.
Secondly, the rear "piston". This will be only a little smaller than the sliding front piston. The point being that the force pushing the front piston against the spring at combustion is (if my physics is right) lessened. As an example, if the front "slide" piston is 2 square inches and the rear is 1 3/4 square inch, then the force on it is 2-1 3/4 x pressure. So if the chamber pressure before combustion is 100psi, then the difference is 25psi - so I don't need such a strong spring.
Here's the revised diagram.
*If JSR can start a new thread for every version then I figure I can
Repeater BB Hybrid - v2.0
- Attachments
-
- Schematic-02.gif (5.82 KiB) Viewed 2413 times
<A HREF="http://www.paisleypeking.co.uk"><IMG BORDER="0" WIDTH="400" HEIGHT="64" SRC="http://www.paisleypeking.co.uk/images/s ... e.gif"></A>
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
So, have you recruited the services of a good, reasonably priced machinist yet? 
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Quick addition to this, relating to the one bit which isn't on the diagram, the spring.
In actual fact there'll be a twin spring system, the first is a weak spring which just pushes the piston back and forth during it's sliding stroke at fuelling and exhaust. This is mainly just to clear the chamber of the combustion gases, so strength isn't an issue as they can vent out of the barrel at the BB port.
The second spring however needs to hold the lot closed against the pressure of the fuel/air mix and only compress when combustion takes place. This will be the shorter in length so that when fully extended it just meets the piston as it slides forwads on fuelling.
Initially I'd wondered about a spring from a BB gun I have but I'd like to be able to adjust the spring rates and hardness. Then I remembered the elastomers used in mountain bike suspension. This is basically a synthetic rubber compound. In an MTB suspension it's provided using elastomer stacks, multiple elastomers lined up one after the other. By changing out some or all for different hardness or rigid spacers you can adjust the spring rate etc. And in MTB use they all come with a convenient hole through the centre, and they're also quite cheap.
So elastomer stack it will be, giving me greater adjustment, and because of their nature a slower rebound rate which will allow greater venting. Diagram to follow as soon as I've got off the phone with this client.
In actual fact there'll be a twin spring system, the first is a weak spring which just pushes the piston back and forth during it's sliding stroke at fuelling and exhaust. This is mainly just to clear the chamber of the combustion gases, so strength isn't an issue as they can vent out of the barrel at the BB port.
The second spring however needs to hold the lot closed against the pressure of the fuel/air mix and only compress when combustion takes place. This will be the shorter in length so that when fully extended it just meets the piston as it slides forwads on fuelling.
Initially I'd wondered about a spring from a BB gun I have but I'd like to be able to adjust the spring rates and hardness. Then I remembered the elastomers used in mountain bike suspension. This is basically a synthetic rubber compound. In an MTB suspension it's provided using elastomer stacks, multiple elastomers lined up one after the other. By changing out some or all for different hardness or rigid spacers you can adjust the spring rate etc. And in MTB use they all come with a convenient hole through the centre, and they're also quite cheap.
So elastomer stack it will be, giving me greater adjustment, and because of their nature a slower rebound rate which will allow greater venting. Diagram to follow as soon as I've got off the phone with this client.
<A HREF="http://www.paisleypeking.co.uk"><IMG BORDER="0" WIDTH="400" HEIGHT="64" SRC="http://www.paisleypeking.co.uk/images/s ... e.gif"></A>
- Jared Haehnel
- Corporal 2

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:15 pm
- Location: White River Jct, Vermont
Nice design. It would be interested to if you could get it to work... looks like a lot of machining though....
- Skywalker
- Specialist


- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:22 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
SPG: very nice! It looks relatively simple for what it's doing; I especially like that you combined the ammo-loading with the rest of the operation, and that your piston sweeps the exhausted air/fuel out on the return stroke. I take it you will have electronic controls for ignition and fuel/air injection, activated by the movement of the barrel assembly.
The only trouble I can see, and this would apply to any valved hybrid, is that it's going to be h-e-double-hockey-sticks for the orings around your pistons. In fact, since your front piston is going to be holding back the whole pressure difference between atm and firing pressure, and having to move some distance under that condition, that sounds a bit harsh. I think Jack's right, it's probably beyond the level of home-building with epoxy etc.
The only trouble I can see, and this would apply to any valved hybrid, is that it's going to be h-e-double-hockey-sticks for the orings around your pistons. In fact, since your front piston is going to be holding back the whole pressure difference between atm and firing pressure, and having to move some distance under that condition, that sounds a bit harsh. I think Jack's right, it's probably beyond the level of home-building with epoxy etc.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
The problem is that epoxy tends to soften when heated, I would worry that the repeated heating from auto fire would cause it to fall apart pretty quickly, at least around the chamber area.Skywalker wrote:I think Jack's right, it's probably beyond the level of home-building with epoxy etc.
I would go for proper machining, it wouldn't be *that* expensive, and a reasonable well machined fit would eliminate the need for o-rings in practice.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Yeah I was avoiding o-rings completely in that assembly, and firing and fueling would be on the trigger, not with any complex electronics, but then to start with I'm only aiming for semi- not fully- auto.
Also because it's only going to be fuelled for a few fractions of a second, I'm not even bothered if there's a few tiny leaks.
Also because it's only going to be fuelled for a few fractions of a second, I'm not even bothered if there's a few tiny leaks.
<A HREF="http://www.paisleypeking.co.uk"><IMG BORDER="0" WIDTH="400" HEIGHT="64" SRC="http://www.paisleypeking.co.uk/images/s ... e.gif"></A>
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 26 Replies
- 9342 Views
-
Last post by spudamine
-
- 10 Replies
- 2954 Views
-
Last post by PinHead
-
- 1 Replies
- 2305 Views
-
Last post by jackssmirkingrevenge
-
- 8 Replies
- 3074 Views
-
Last post by Gun Freak
-
- 8 Replies
- 3588 Views
-
Last post by squidchicken

