How to Disprove/Deem Plausible Ridiculous Range Claims

Cannons powered by pneumatic pressure (compressed gas) using a valve or other release.
User avatar
D_Hall
Staff Sergeant 5
Staff Sergeant 5
United States of America
Posts: 1948
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: SoCal
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Solar wrote:Can't forget to calculate what phase the moon is in or the latitude of the shot. :-p Sorry, couldn't resist.
LOL. While i've never done phase of the moon, I assure you that latitude isn't that horribly difficult.
User avatar
koolaidman
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:46 pm

Thats not too bad mark, those equations seem about right. I was producing a simular formula cause i dont have ggdt. Your's makes good sense, but im not sure you need to incorporate work, energy, or integration. I started off by saying that: range=v cos(angle) t. You can make v a function of the acceleration from the force of the average pressure in the barrel and T should be a the time the procetile stays in the air- t=-2v sin(angle)/g. I used mine more closely for a mortar that i made and the final equation had only pressure and the angle as variables. What i showed above was just a bit of what i actually did and i took more into account, i dont want to explain it all, im just trying to say what you did might have been overkill.
User avatar
jimmy101
Sergeant Major 2
Sergeant Major 2
United States of America
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

Markfh11q, it's a lot easier for the combustion gunners to do a similar analysis.

For a combustion gun you just need to calculate the energy in the chamber based on it's volume and the heat of combustion of the fuel.

Compare the result with the kinetic energy of the round. If the KE is more than ~10% of the chemical energy in the chamber then something is wrong. Combustion spudguns are rarely much more than 10% efficient. If the observed KE is 15% then it is remotely possible. If it is any more than 15% then something is wrong with the velocity or mass of the ammo (or volume of the chamber or ....)

If the claim is based on distance, instead of a measured muzzle velocity or the ole "it was really loud so the round must have been supersonic", then the external ballistics analysis is required like you suggested.

Some of the wilder claims for combustion guns would require gun efficiencies of well over 50%. That just ain't going to happen with these guns. I think it can be pretty safely stated that nothing you do with a combustion gun (including hybrids) will ever get the efficiency above about 30%. And, it is very likely that no combustion spud gun yet built has even gotten to 20%.
Image
User avatar
mark.f
Sergeant Major 4
Sergeant Major 4
Eritrea
Posts: 3643
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
Location: The Big Steezy
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 62 times
Contact:

Yes, I remember using this approach when BigBang supposedly measured supersonic golfballs with a standard combustion.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post