Here is a similar design in a chamber sealing configuration. http://www.geocities.com/man_o_brass/in ... valve.html
Although in this case it would be a much better idea to go with a barrel sealing setup.
I don't believe I've ever seen such a valve actually get made. Although there is a commercial air cannon (for unclogging grain silos) that has a very similar setup.
Linear Piston Valve Idea
-
clide
- Corporal 3

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:06 am
- Location: Oklahoma, USA
- Been thanked: 1 time
<a href="http://gbcannon.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://gbcannon.com/pics/misc/pixel.png" border="0"></a>latest update - debut of the cardapult
- MrCrowley
- Moderator

- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
The reason I put the pilot in two directions is just to show that the pilot could go to the end of the chamber, or come out the middle.
If I did build this, I would probably set it how it is in the picture, fill from the rear, fire from the middle.
The purple supports would be a 4"x2" bushing cut in half. So a support at the rear and at the front that is glued to half the circumference of the chamber, should be plenty enough to withstand the piston.
You could put the supports on opposite sides, one top one bottom but that would further reduce the flow. The way it is in the picture will make the air to simply go over the top of the piston housing.
Another limitation in this design is the porting, because a 3" piston housing in a 4" chamber wouldn't have the best flow. I wonder what would be better, larger seat but less flow in the chamber, or larger flow in the chamber but a smaller seat.
If I did build this, I would probably set it how it is in the picture, fill from the rear, fire from the middle.
The purple supports would be a 4"x2" bushing cut in half. So a support at the rear and at the front that is glued to half the circumference of the chamber, should be plenty enough to withstand the piston.
You could put the supports on opposite sides, one top one bottom but that would further reduce the flow. The way it is in the picture will make the air to simply go over the top of the piston housing.
Another limitation in this design is the porting, because a 3" piston housing in a 4" chamber wouldn't have the best flow. I wonder what would be better, larger seat but less flow in the chamber, or larger flow in the chamber but a smaller seat.
- Attachments
-
- FLV 2.jpg (39.45 KiB) Viewed 1357 times
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
From the practical aspect, most of the piston guns I've made recently are configured this way, seems to work well enough, both in terms for sealing and performance.psycix wrote:When the thin layer of air between it pushes the piston back and the piston starts to move back, the thin layer becomes "doublethin" thickness within no-time, reducing pressure inside the layer unless air from the chamber flows into the layer and the still very thin layer does not allow that much flow.
And because of that, there MIGHT* slip trough a bit of air I think. When it seals against a pipe, the sealing face is very forcefully pressed on that area of sealing, allowing no air to escape.
Also, imperfections on the two surfaces create ways for the air to escape trough the seal.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
I'd remove the purple supports and have it rest solely on the fill pipe, that of course assumes rugged construction involving copious amounts of epoxy 
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- MrCrowley
- Moderator

- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
That's the best kind of constructionjackssmirkingrevenge wrote:I'd remove the purple supports and have it rest solely on the fill pipe, that of course assumes rugged construction involving copious amounts of epoxy
I think that this design will have similar flow to that of a 2" barrel sealer with an over-under 4" chamber. I have some 4" pipe laying around so I just might give this a go.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
... also, the concept of separate filling and pilot valves is alien to me
but I guess there's only so much you can pilot with a schrader ;p
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- MrCrowley
- Moderator

- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
Haha i'd love to see you try and pilot 300mm of 15mm pipe with a schrader
I'm actually getting serious about this design now with the competition coming up and all.
Depending on the chamber length, I would change how the fill valve/pilot valve is set up. Which would be threaded through the coupler for thickness.
Parts list (Just so I have it written down somewhere other then my head):
3 - 4"x2" PVC bushing (piston support, chamber rear, chamber front)
1 - 2"x1" PVC bushing
1 - 1"x1/2" threaded PVC bushing
1 - 2" PVC female threaded socket adapter
1 - 2" PVC male threaded adapter
1 - 2"x1.5" PVC bushing (Golfball barrel)
1 - 2" PVC end cap
1 - 4" coupler
Various brass fittings
Thinks that's about it.
I'm actually getting serious about this design now with the competition coming up and all.
Depending on the chamber length, I would change how the fill valve/pilot valve is set up. Which would be threaded through the coupler for thickness.
Parts list (Just so I have it written down somewhere other then my head):
3 - 4"x2" PVC bushing (piston support, chamber rear, chamber front)
1 - 2"x1" PVC bushing
1 - 1"x1/2" threaded PVC bushing
1 - 2" PVC female threaded socket adapter
1 - 2" PVC male threaded adapter
1 - 2"x1.5" PVC bushing (Golfball barrel)
1 - 2" PVC end cap
1 - 4" coupler
Various brass fittings
Thinks that's about it.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
I once made a coaxial with the body of a footpump as a chamber, must have been around 50mm diameter. Managed to pilot it with a schrader, but then again as I was using the (modified) pump head as a piston, and it had a floating o-ring, the fact that it was a good seal made it easy.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 2153 Views
-
Last post by joannaardway
-
- 5 Replies
- 2134 Views
-
Last post by -T0OL-
-
- 38 Replies
- 11123 Views
-
Last post by dongfang
-
- 27 Replies
- 4926 Views
-
Last post by dongfang
-
- 31 Replies
- 6319 Views
-
Last post by 8tonsemi
