My new plans.

Cannons powered by pneumatic pressure (compressed gas) using a valve or other release.
User avatar
elad311
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:48 am

Ok, tomorrow, I'll buy some steel parts for my pneumatic, and I was
wondering, how much psi will the cannon take?
(Tell me if i can improve something..)
Attachments
My plans.
My plans.
Pneumatic STEEL.PNG (3.91 KiB) Viewed 2641 times
User avatar
jimmy101
Sergeant Major 2
Sergeant Major 2
United States of America
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

Steel is overkill for this design since the performance will be limited by the ball valve. For this setup, just use PVC and save yourself a bunch-o money.

With the money you saved get a better valve. Even a $15 sprinkler valve will be better than the ball valve.

Do you have a source of compressed air that is greater than ~150 PSI? Most shop compressors are limited to about 120~150 which is well within the range of PVC so steel isn't needed. If you have a source of higher pressures (CO2 tank, SCUBA air tank etc.) then steel is needed. But with the ball valve the performance will still suck, considering how much $$$ it'll cost for the rest of the gun.
Image
User avatar
Gippeto
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Venezuela
Posts: 2504
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:14 am
Location: Soon to be socialist shit hole.
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 17 times

elad311 wrote:Ok, tomorrow, I'll buy some steel parts for my pneumatic, and I was
wondering, how much psi will the cannon take?
(Tell me if i can improve something..)
Are you going to simply thread this together using all pre-cut (factory) threads?

If so, what is the rating on the lowest rated part? That is your answer.

I wouldn't worry about it up to around 500psi.(depending on your valve of course.) (but that's me, not you :wink: )

Suggestions;

You could go over/under if you wanted to shorten things up.

Use a couple of 90 degree elbows from the chamber and into the ball valve.

Leave the barrel attached to the ball valve, or use a union to mount the barrel for a simple breech loader.
"It could be that the purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others" – unknown

Liberalism is a mental disorder, reality is it's cure.
User avatar
elad311
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:48 am

jimmy101 wrote:Steel is overkill for this design since the performance will be limited by the ball valve. For this setup, just use PVC and save yourself a bunch-o money.

With the money you saved get a better valve. Even a $15 sprinkler valve will be better than the ball valve.

Do you have a source of compressed air that is greater than ~150 PSI? Most shop compressors are limited to about 120~150 which is well within the range of PVC so steel isn't needed. If you have a source of higher pressures (CO2 tank, SCUBA air tank etc.) then steel is needed. But with the ball valve the performance will still suck, considering how much $$$ it'll cost for the rest of the gun.
But i'm gonna make a trigger system for it, and it should open it very fast, right?
User avatar
ALIHISGREAT
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: UK

i would highly reccomend a QEV valve or a Piston valve, they outperform ball valves massively.
User avatar
Demon
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 743
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:46 am

But i'm gonna make a trigger system for it, and it should open it very fast, right?
A modded sprinkler valve open a lot faster then a "modded"ball valve...


Edit: Alihisgreat posted 10 sec before me :(
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

elad311 wrote:But i'm gonna make a trigger system for it, and it should open it very fast, right?
Perhaps 50 milliseconds, possibly a little less with a strong spring mechanism
Even an unmodded sprinkler valve is down at 10 or 15 milliseconds.

Given that projectiles are usually in the barrel for only a couple of dozen milliseconds at the outside, a spring loaded ball valve cannot open fast enough to provide enough power.

To elaborate on what the people above have said, seriously, a ball valve is a waste - and if you're asking about how much pressure it can take... why waste what pressure you put in by using an inefficient valve?

I have a cannon that uses 300 psi, and it has a piston valve.
If I were to give it a sprung loaded ball valve instead with no other changes, I'd be looking at less than a quarter of the power, at best.

Put it another way, with the piston valve, it performs better at 60 psi than if it had a ball valve and 300 psi. (It does with 15 psi what my first cannon couldn't do with 120psi!)
Given I can get 4 or 5 times the energy by using a better valve, and for no more pressure input, the ball valve seems laughable as a concept.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
elad311
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:48 am

I don't really know about piston valve, i need to buy it, or i need
to make it?
and, can you give me a picture?
User avatar
Biopyro
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 654
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:32 am
Location: UK

If I were you, (assuming you live in the US) I'd go for a sprinkler valve. In the UK, go for a QEV. The mechanisms of both are fairly complicated, but are explained here. I wouldn't expect you to understand straight off.

Of course if you can't get either of these valve types, by all means go for a ball valve. If you have it non-handheld, so that you can hit the valve open with your fist it will be much more powerful.

The ball valve will connect fine to PVC, just by screwing it onto the threads on the plastic (so long as they are the same size)
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -Benjamin Franklin
TurboSuper
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 986
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:44 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Sprinkler valves are the best balance of simplicity and power, imo.
"If at first you dont succeed, then skydiving is not for you" - Darwin Awards
User avatar
Lentamentalisk
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1202
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Berkeley C.A.

search for the part #6646K23 at McCaster-Carr. It says it is rated to 125psi, but I have used it at 600psi without any signs of deterioration or failure.


edit:
Here it is. Believe me, the QEV really helps. I shot a piece of wood at 5/6 the speed of sound...
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/pics-up ... 14547.html
Do not look back, and grieve over the past, for it is gone;
Do not be troubled about the future, for it has not yet come;
Live life in the present, and make it so beautiful that it will be worth remembering.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • I need some plans....!
    by elad311 » » in General Cannon Discussion
    11 Replies
    3500 Views
    Last post by jimmy101
  • My plans
    by john bunsenburner » » in Pneumatic Cannons
    20 Replies
    4209 Views
    Last post by john bunsenburner
  • A 'My First Plans' and Hello!
    by Butterfli » » in Pneumatic Cannons
    9 Replies
    3060 Views
    Last post by psycix
  • my new plans
    by unisonmind » » in Pneumatic Cannons
    6 Replies
    1839 Views
    Last post by Hotwired
  • A few new plans
    by Hero » » in Combustion Cannons
    4 Replies
    1840 Views
    Last post by splinterhelix