well after reading all of the new posts written to help noobs i wanted to make my own.
this is a comparison of Dwv and nsf-pw
hope it helps!!!
nsf-pw vs. dwv
- dudeman508
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 9:19 pm
- Attachments
-
- and a nsf-pw tee
- pvc_tee[1].jpg (3.13 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
-
- a dwv tee
- Tigre%20PVC%20Sanitary%20Tee[1].jpg (21.07 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
-
- and a nsf-pw 45degree elbow
- Generic-417-020-rw-5562-207[1].jpg (5 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
-
- a dwv 45degree elbow
- Tigre%20PVC%201-8%20bend[1].jpg (18.03 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
-
- and an nsf-pw 90degree elbow
- Generic-406-020-rw-5568-201[1].jpg (6.24 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
-
- a dwv 90degree elbow
- PVC-90-Elbow[1].gif (17.25 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
-
- and a nsf-pw reducer bushing
- 6985162[1].jpg (4.9 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
-
- a dwv bell reducer
- 6156921[1].jpg (15.1 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
-
- and a nsf-pw coupling, notice its longer
- 3183027[1].jpg (13.99 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
-
- A dwv coupling, notice its a lot shorter
- Tigre%20PVC%20Coupling[1].jpg (24.37 KiB) Viewed 6320 times
- dudeman508
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 9:19 pm
.....oh
. I didnt see that when i looked at spud wiki
- dudeman508
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 9:19 pm
thats really weird, did you paint over the pipe? Can you clearly see the writing?
- daberno123
- Corporal

- Posts: 594
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Ohio
As long as it has a printed pressure rating on it it should be fine. Most of my pipes have both printed on it, along with a pressure rating to XXX psi
This is not uncommon. Any pipe that is suitable for PW (Potable Water) and is pressure rated is certainly up to the tasks of DWV (Drain Waste Vent, all low pressure applications).jon_89 wrote:Why do they put both on the pipe?
It's a certification of what the pipe is usable for, not a pressure rating in itself. Unfortunately, DWV has incorrectly become a synonym for "non pressure rated", which is what has caused this confusion.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
- dudeman508
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 9:19 pm
this is kind of random but on sch 80 pipe is the outer diameter bigger than that of a sch 40 pipe or is the inner diameter smaller. I'm guessing the inner diameter is smaller because if it wasn't people would use sch40 for golf ball barrels
Yeah it is, but since soooo many seem to skip wiki, this is a reasonably informative post...well put together. Anything to help raise awareness overall is a good thing....even if it's post by post..... 8)FishBoy wrote:unfortunately, this already exists in the wiki...
You are exactly right. The inner diameters are [maddeningly] not consistant with much of anything. The outer diameters have to fit common couplings.dudeman508 wrote:this is kind of random but on sch 80 pipe is the outer diameter bigger than that of a sch 40 pipe or is the inner diameter smaller. I'm guessing the inner diameter is smaller because if it wasn't people would use sch40 for golf ball barrels
One of the better "inner diameters" you can count on is the 2" sched 80....fits the outer dia of 1.5" pvc pipe like a glove.
Indeed. Considering SCH40, a dimensioning standard, to be a pressure standard can't have good results - however, it is better that people flock to unrated SCH40 than they use unrated thin wall or cell core pipe.MrCrowley wrote:And we're still working on the 'Sch 40 = Pressure Rated' synonym that dominates the web.
Obviously, killing both misconceptions dead would be ideal, but that's unlikely to happen. In spite of this forum being the biggest spud forum on the web, we do not make up enough of spudding as a whole - we make up a healthy majority of the high quality spudding, but not much overall.
However, as in the end, pressure ratings do not relate to the circumstances of a spudgun, a pressure rating is little more than a guarantee of more quality control and thus less likelihood that you'll get a dud piece of pipe.
The maximum burst pressure (That being the absolute maximum that could be expected the pipe would hold before bursting - i.e. add 1 more psi, and you could guarantee the pipe wouldn't withstand it) of rated SCH40 and unrated SCH40 specimens could take would be the roughly the same.
However, samples of unrated SCH40 specimens will have a lower "minimum burst pressure". (That being the lowest pressure at which the pipe will burst).
@dudeman508: Your assumption is correct, the internal diameter is reduced. The external diameter is unaffected.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
- D_Hall
- Staff Sergeant 5


- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:37 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Thing is, Sch 40 = pressure rated USED to be a true statement.MrCrowley wrote:And we're still working on the 'Sch 40 = Pressure Rated' synonym that dominates the web.DWV has incorrectly become a synonym for "non pressure rated"
Seriously.
ONCE UPON A TIME.....
Schedule = 1000 * Pressure / Allowable_Stress
....So yeah, once upon a time "sch 40" had very real implications regarding a pipe's ability to handle pressure. Alas, somewhere along the line the dimensions were standardized (made sense) and then materials changed (which then made the sch XX nomenclature meaningless!).
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute




