Portable Guns

Cannons powered by pneumatic pressure (compressed gas) using a valve or other release.
User avatar
maverik94
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 558
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:48 pm

Ok, I have been working on building a gun that is completely portable, in other words, I don't have to hook it up to a compressor or to a seperate air pump. I have tried my hand at building a single action air rifle, a spring piston air rifle, and a pcp air rifle. I have failed at all three. I got the farthest on the pcp gun, I had the hammer valve functional, but it was leaking badly, so i scrapped it. I was wondering what your Ideas were on building a portable gun. I don't really want to use co2, but I want to hear your ideas. Are there any kinds of portable guns I have missed? Do any of you know of any tutorials on building any of these types of guns EASILY? Thanks.
EDIT: Oh, I forgot, this gun would be a .177" (4.5mm) bore gun.
"You can't be friends with anyone if you aren't friends with yourself."
"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I'm not." -André Gide
Give me a lever long enough, and a fulcrum on which to place it and I shall move the world.
–Archimedes
Defeat is always momentary.
–Carl Denham

Current Project: None, I'm in Spudremission.
User avatar
Hotwired
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:51 am
Location: UK

What's completely portable?

I mean I call mine completely portable because it and a full size track pump plus a ton of projectiles can fit into a sizeable rucksack to be carted anywhere.

If we're talking an epic number of shots from a single charge and without using co2+ pressure you're not going to be a happy bunny.

You could get half a dozen shots from high track pump pressure without much problem using partial pilot venting on a QEV. BTB has a working one that uses a hammer valve to pop the pilot side and I've left a trail of random posts over a couple of years and in fact a thread somewhere on how my current cannon does the same thing but using manual valves.

Is that what you're after?



Edit: because you edited: if this is just a 4.5mm design you really do need to get a hammer valve. QEV multishot methods are very inefficient for firing a tiny pellet at a time.
User avatar
theBOOM
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

I've been thinking of an idea to take apart a co2 airfost gun and incorporating its mechanism of firing into a homemade gun... It would be powered by co2 cartridges that would gimmie a good hundred shots or so.... I mean you could doodle with it some and see what you come up with :roll:

I dunno that's what I would call portable.. beacause you can take it anywhere.. you would just need a co2 catridge ... I'm trying to think up of a way to let a precise measure of compressed air out for each shot with some type of valve.. but i dunno :?

Boom
User avatar
maverik94
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 558
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:48 pm

Well, As I said I don't really want to use co2. What i mean by portable is that I can carry just the gun and ammo around w/o any kind of external pump...I was thinking of having a multi-stroke on-board pump, I would be happy if I could get a 4.5mm bb to got 500 fps with 3-4 pumps. What I really need is a tutorial on how to make one of these from scratch. Anyone? Thanks for the Ideas.
"You can't be friends with anyone if you aren't friends with yourself."
"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I'm not." -André Gide
Give me a lever long enough, and a fulcrum on which to place it and I shall move the world.
–Archimedes
Defeat is always momentary.
–Carl Denham

Current Project: None, I'm in Spudremission.
User avatar
twizi
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 511
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 9:04 pm
Location: up yours

gippeto has a how to
dont play with airsofter with 1000$ gun and play with a 5 dollar pair of glasses
User avatar
inonickname
First Sergeant 4
First Sergeant 4
Posts: 2606
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:27 am

Well an on-board multi-pump should be obvious..

And no, no-one will spoonfeed you. Have a look through the showcase, mitch made a multipump gun.

As for multiple shots, you won't get them without doing the hard yards.
PimpAssasinG wrote:no im strong but you are a fat gay mother sucker that gets raped by black man for fun
User avatar
mobile chernobyl
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
United States of America
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:53 am
Been thanked: 8 times

if you want portable, look into my BOSS system. I dunno how common-place it is on spudguns, but on paintball guns it's the norm.

http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtop ... tml#250427
User avatar
mark.f
Sergeant Major 4
Sergeant Major 4
Eritrea
Posts: 3643
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
Location: The Big Steezy
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 62 times
Contact:

A multi-stroke onboard pump would work, but for very small volumes, if you're planning on about the same number of strokes at a conventional pellet multi-stroke.

In a pellet gun, the pump uses mechanical advantage and multiple pump strokes to get VERY high pressures in a small hammer-valve-check-valve combination bolted into the pump tube. It is a very small volume of air, but at very high pressures.

If you could achieve the same thing, why build a .177 caliber BB gun? Kind of boring when you can walk to the store and get one for about 20 bucks. I would work on the same thing, just with a few more pump strokes and a larger bore not common in conventional airguns, like 3/8" or 1/2" or even 3/4" ID. Would take a much longer pump stroke and more strokes... maybe a wider pump bore, but the shot's power would more than make up for it.

As far as the valve goes, a hammer valve is just about the de facto standard. The pump bore (and air reservoir) is usually stacked under the barrel, with a perpendicular port to the hammer valve which dumps into the barrel, usually behind the pellet and around the bolt. Take a look at the bottom of this page for an example of a PCP airgun (uses just about the same operation principles, just a different power source) made during WWII. Been around for a bit. :P
User avatar
inonickname
First Sergeant 4
First Sergeant 4
Posts: 2606
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:27 am

If you're going single shot in large bores then hammer valves get less practical. A QEV would be a better idea (spring so it could be filled from chamber). If you want to stay with a hammer valve, but have to face no opening pressure i can find my pictures i drew up for a co-axial hammer valve air cane.
PimpAssasinG wrote:no im strong but you are a fat gay mother sucker that gets raped by black man for fun
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post