chamber diameter and length combination?

Boom! The classic potato gun harnesses the combustion of flammable vapor.
User avatar
cfb_rolley
Specialist
Specialist
Australia
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:11 pm

So I was about to start embarking on my next cannon design since my very first DWV cannon developed a crack (and therefore I had to stop using it there and then), and decided I'd go with pressure rated pipe again like my second cannon (still going strong).

I wanted to make something similar to an M82A2 style setup, and use a false magazine to hide the fan batteries etc. the problem is that the chamber would be about 65mm I.D x 400 or 500mm long. I remember being told that a chamber config like this can cause DDT, and that's bad.

Would 2 or 4 spark gaps at equal spacing along the chamber eliminate the risk of DDT while leaving my fan undamaged?

also, the barrel I.D would be about 20mm, however I could go to 32mm. is 20mm too small in relation to the chamber diameter?

cheers in advance.
User avatar
Labtecpower
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Eritrea
Posts: 1297
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:38 am
Location: Pyongyang
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 13 times

I assume you are talking about a atmospheric combustion?

In that case DDT wouldn't be a problem. As far as I know, there has not been a single case of DDT in combustions using standard mixtures. (propane,butane / air)
User avatar
cfb_rolley
Specialist
Specialist
Australia
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:11 pm

Definitely only an advanced combustion, yeah. Not ready for a hybrid build yet.
User avatar
saefroch
Staff Sergeant 2
Staff Sergeant 2
Posts: 1679
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:47 am
Location: U.S.A.- See Map

DDT is really less of a danger than most people think, though it has been induced at atmospheric conditions, it require a specialized setup. And in any case, with the nitrogen present in the air, there's no significant risk with most air-fuel mixes.
User avatar
cfb_rolley
Specialist
Specialist
Australia
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:11 pm

awesome, that's good news. how about the difference between the chamber diameter and the barrel diameter? can problems be caused by having say, a 17mm I.D barrel and a 65mm I.D chamber?
User avatar
saefroch
Staff Sergeant 2
Staff Sergeant 2
Posts: 1679
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:47 am
Location: U.S.A.- See Map

Nope. In my opinion you'd be losing out by using such a small barrel on a sizable chamber, but there is no danger. Just keep in mind that the pressure=Force/Area, so at one pressure the larger the area the larger the force. You can pack a lot more kinetic energy onto a projectile with a larger diameter barrel.
User avatar
cfb_rolley
Specialist
Specialist
Australia
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:11 pm

that's good. the reason why i asked is because I'm going to have a threaded fitting to be able to change barrels to different sizes to launch different things, just was worried about going too small.
User avatar
saefroch
Staff Sergeant 2
Staff Sergeant 2
Posts: 1679
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:47 am
Location: U.S.A.- See Map

I suggest a sabot if you're going to launch small objects, not a smaller barrel. You'll get higher muzzle velocity using a reasonably low-density sabot over a smaller barrel.
User avatar
cfb_rolley
Specialist
Specialist
Australia
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:11 pm

hmm, didn't think of that either, thanks for that one.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post