Barrel to chamber size?
-
KS-collector
- Private 2

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:25 am
Im no math wiz, so can anyone double check this ratio for me? Barrel is 3 inches wide, 3 ft long. Chamber is 6 inches wide, 15 inches long. That should be about 1:1.5 barrel:chamber ratio, correct? Which is the proper ratio, yes?
-
KS-collector
- Private 2

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:25 am
Close enough to 1:1.5 for me. Thanks!
-
KS-collector
- Private 2

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:25 am
But I thought the chamber had to be bigger to propell the spud (or in my case nerf football) all the way out of the barrel. If I could make the chamber smaller, it would greatly help my purposes but I dont see how that would work as well as a large chamber even accounting for expansion of ignition.jsefcik wrote:What ever your chamber is make your barrel double your chamber size!!
If your chamber is too big and barrel is short your not getting full potential out of your gun
For example 3 foot chamber to a 6 foot barrel , you want your gases to fully burn!
If you can't get the barrel and chamber ratio right you want it close as possible
My piston cannon has a 5 foot barrel and chamber
My barrel should be longer but I'm not made of money !! My pistOn cannon puts golfballs 500 yards and beyond
Pm me if you want
For example 3 foot chamber to a 6 foot barrel , you want your gases to fully burn!
If you can't get the barrel and chamber ratio right you want it close as possible
My piston cannon has a 5 foot barrel and chamber
My barrel should be longer but I'm not made of money !! My pistOn cannon puts golfballs 500 yards and beyond
Pm me if you want
For a given chamber volume, the optimal barrel will be 1.4x bigger than the chamber. Any bigger, and you start to loose performance.
With a constant barrel volume, the results are more complex. This shows that anything above 1.2 hurts performance, but HGDT predicts a steady increase
With a constant barrel volume, the results are more complex. This shows that anything above 1.2 hurts performance, but HGDT predicts a steady increase
- Attachments
-
- temp.jpg (26.88 KiB) Viewed 3004 times
POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name
- mattyzip77
- Sergeant 3


- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:22 pm
- Location: Taxachusetts
The wiki knows all!! Also, look at other members c b ratio. I would say your close enough. Also try running different figures through GGDT. Welcome and good luck!!

Go Bruins!!!!
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 14 Replies
- 2998 Views
-
Last post by jackssmirkingrevenge
-
- 10 Replies
- 2376 Views
-
Last post by CS
-
- 4 Replies
- 3348 Views
-
Last post by boilingleadbath
-
- 3 Replies
- 2460 Views
-
Last post by saladtossser
-
- 10 Replies
- 2758 Views
-
Last post by brettdotcom14


