Ok, I recently came up with this new idea for a valve. I call it the compression piston. The piston is located inside the camber of a pneumatic cannon. The piston has a great high pressure seal. When you make a cannon that would have this piston on it, the scharder valve were you fill the cannon would be in front of the chamber. On the back of the chamber there is a crank that is connected to a long bolt that is connected to the back on the piston.
What you would do is this. First you would fill the chamber with air. Then what you would do is twist the crank as far as you can thorugh the chamber. What this would do is boost your psi in the chamber, allowing the air to escape the chamber faster when the cannon is fired.
What do you guys think of the idea?
New Valve idea
- CannonCreator
- Specialist 3

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Moorpark, CA
- Contact:
- TwitchTheAussie
- Corporal 5

- Posts: 980
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:23 am
I think some pics would be nice.
Raise your horns if you love metal.
CpTn_lAw
-spudgunning is like sex, once you've tasted, you can't wait til next time.
CpTn_lAw
wait, you have to crank it open? that sounds mightly slow to me... plus, getting the crank airtight is a engineering feat it's self.
ps- if i am wrong, discard this post.
ps- if i am wrong, discard this post.
"physics, gravity, and law enforcement are the only things that prevent me from operating at my full potential" - not sure, but i like the quote
you know you are not an engineer if you have to remind yourself "left loosy righty tighty"
you know you are not an engineer if you have to remind yourself "left loosy righty tighty"
-
Novacastrian
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:59 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
I believe you are correct hi, as a ginger beer i fully agree with your comments, back to the drawing board on this one CC 
Edit: it may be possible if you were to use a pnuematic actuator instead of the crank, but it would cost an arm and a leg :
Edit: it may be possible if you were to use a pnuematic actuator instead of the crank, but it would cost an arm and a leg :
- Pilgrimman
- Specialist 4

- Posts: 480
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:10 pm
- Location: Grants Pass, OR
It's interesting, but I think the increase in pressure would be offset by the dead volume created when the piston is opened. If you are pushing the piston forward, the dead space is occupied by the piston, and when the piston moves, the dead space is occupied by the air, decreasing power. (This is all assuming that I interpreted your description correctly) However, I think the idea has some potential. Try it, and tell us how it goes! Some schematics would be nice too! 
Yeah, we wouldn't want to anger the bees, now would we??
I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES!
LMAO Classic!!!! I love Family Guy!
I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES!
LMAO Classic!!!! I love Family Guy!
- CannonCreator
- Specialist 3

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Moorpark, CA
- Contact:
ok thanks, Im drwaing up more stuff right now.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 1480 Views
-
Last post by Benny
-
- 4 Replies
- 3140 Views
-
Last post by Urban Ninja
-
- 7 Replies
- 4669 Views
-
Last post by spudshot
-
- 6 Replies
- 1771 Views
-
Last post by sgort87
-
- 0 Replies
- 6290 Views
-
Last post by PCGUY
