Chamber Barrel ratio (Pneumatic)

Cannons powered by pneumatic pressure (compressed gas) using a valve or other release.
carl2.0
Private 2
Private 2
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:20 am

Hey guys

I just want to know what is the chamber barrel ratio for pneumatics. I heard that combustions have a diff ratio
User avatar
octane89
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:20 pm

Anywhere from .8:1 to 4:1. There won't be to much of a power difference, the big deal is how much flow you can have. The more air (cubic inches) and flow of it, the more power.
"Only after disaster can we be resurrected."
Go Listen to My Friends...The Devil Wears Prada
User avatar
rna_duelers
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:07 am
Location: G-land Australia

Also how quickly you can flow the air,in other words valve speed and type has more of an impact on the power then the ratios.Anything above 1:1 in my opinion is good but also the pressure you are going to run it at also has an impact on the power achieved.

Got a rough design you want to throw at us?
Image
User avatar
bigbob12345
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:13 am
Location: Mercer Island,Washington

Yea it really doesnt matter but supposedly 4:1 is the best ratio
User avatar
rna_duelers
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:07 am
Location: G-land Australia

There is no 'best' ratio.Valves have a much larger impact on the performance of a gun then the ratios,if you were to open a 50mm ball valve and vent a chamber of say 1000cc into a barrel off 1000cc so the ratio of 1:1 you would get a velocity of X from the projectile,use the same chamber same barrel same projectile and pressure but use a 3/4 QEV that open in milliseconds and you would have a higher increase in velocity.

Ratios have very little to do with the power achieved and the efficiency of a launcher.
Image
User avatar
octane89
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:20 pm

With combustions, you build based on C:B ratios. With pneumatics, you build based on valve design.
"Only after disaster can we be resurrected."
Go Listen to My Friends...The Devil Wears Prada
User avatar
DYI
First Sergeant 5
First Sergeant 5
Antigua & Barbuda
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Here and there

At normal pressures, the "best" C:B ratio for pneumatics is around 0.2:1.
Obviously however, increasing chamber size will always increase performance. The .2:1 ratio assumes a fixed chamber size.
Please, download GGDT and save yourself the trouble of posting topics like these. I really don't know how people even design pneumatics without it.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
User avatar
bigbob12345
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:13 am
Location: Mercer Island,Washington

And what would normal pressures be. Ive always heard the ideal ratio is 4:1 but I could be wrong.And your all right that the ratio hardly matters at all it is mostly just the valve flow and opening speed that matters so dont worry about the ratio just get a really good valve
Novacastrian
Staff Sergeant 2
Staff Sergeant 2
Posts: 1603
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:59 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

bigbob12345 wrote:And what would normal pressures be. Ive always heard the ideal ratio is 4:1 but I could be wrong.And your all right that the ratio hardly matters at all it is mostly just the valve flow and opening speed that matters so dont worry about the ratio just get a really good valve
You are right that you are wrong.
C:B ratios differ from person to person, it's a never ending argument.
America, the greatest gangster of all time. With 200 million odd foot soldiers at it's whim and call.
When you fill your car with refined oil remember that it has been paid for with blood and guts, some from your own countrymen, most not.
User avatar
DYI
First Sergeant 5
First Sergeant 5
Antigua & Barbuda
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Here and there

The 4:1 thing assumes a fixed barrel size for some reason. It is near the point where the diminishing returns make increasing the chamber size any more pointless. But really, by increasing chamber size over 1:1, all you're doing is wasting gas. By normal pressures, I meant what your average compressor or bike pump can put out, no more than 160 psi. At these pressures, around 0.2:1 IS the perfect C:B ratio, assuming a fixed chamber size (which it usually is). There is no debate otherwise, because a larger chamber will always mean increased performance for a given barrel.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
User avatar
SpudUke5
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1099
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:16 pm

Rna_duelers the 50 millimeter might offer better performance only because the ball valve has a bigger flow rate even though it opens faster. But essentially you are right. it all depends on the cannon design. I kno i had a time where a 3/4 inch ball valve performed better for me than a 3/4 sprinkler.
4SPC, My 4" piston 3" porting cannon
Memo:
Fix up copper cannon
Fix up 4SPC
Start Stirrup pump
Start Toolies piston bazooka
User avatar
Eddbot
Specialist 4
Specialist 4
Posts: 434
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:08 pm

i think someone should do some experiments using a basic inline pneumatic, altering the c:b to to every whole number like 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, and use the same modded sprinkler in every test, just so we could get some baseline data for the C:B ratio debate. not me...way too expensive :munky2: ... monkeh!
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26219
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 347 times

You can model it with GGDT to give you a rought idea of performance. In general, bigger chamber = better performance and more noise. By how much performance actually improves however depends on your valve, barrel length etc. - again, model it in GGDT to get an idea before you build.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
ALIHISGREAT
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: UK

Eddbot wrote:i think someone should do some experiments using a basic inline pneumatic, altering the c:b to to every whole number like 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, and use the same modded sprinkler in every test, just so we could get some baseline data for the C:B ratio debate. not me...way too expensive :munky2: ... monkeh!
there is not really much point because the general rule is to put on a barrel as long as you can and uness you have a tiny chamber it should always give an increase in performance (although it may only be small) because in most pneumatics air is not exactly wasted but not used to its full potential because a few fps could be gained by having a longer barrel.
User avatar
BigGrib
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 652
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:43 pm
Location: TriCities, WA
Contact:

i think the most efficient chamber barrel ratio for a pneumatic would all depend on your pressure you're gonna run. a 1:1 ratio would be most efficient if you were running at twice the atmospheric pressure would it not?? As Far as most powerful it doesn't freaking matter. power that damn thing up and launch some spuds!!!!!!
Yea, that's definitely going to get you at least a tazer.
<a href="">DONT TAZE ME BRO.. DONT TAZE ME... AHHHH</a>
facebook.com/biggrib
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post