Hey guys
I just want to know what is the chamber barrel ratio for pneumatics. I heard that combustions have a diff ratio
Chamber Barrel ratio (Pneumatic)
Anywhere from .8:1 to 4:1. There won't be to much of a power difference, the big deal is how much flow you can have. The more air (cubic inches) and flow of it, the more power.
"Only after disaster can we be resurrected."
Go Listen to My Friends...The Devil Wears Prada
Go Listen to My Friends...The Devil Wears Prada
- rna_duelers
- Staff Sergeant 3

- Posts: 1739
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:07 am
- Location: G-land Australia
Also how quickly you can flow the air,in other words valve speed and type has more of an impact on the power then the ratios.Anything above 1:1 in my opinion is good but also the pressure you are going to run it at also has an impact on the power achieved.
Got a rough design you want to throw at us?
Got a rough design you want to throw at us?

- bigbob12345
- Staff Sergeant

- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:13 am
- Location: Mercer Island,Washington
Yea it really doesnt matter but supposedly 4:1 is the best ratio
- rna_duelers
- Staff Sergeant 3

- Posts: 1739
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:07 am
- Location: G-land Australia
There is no 'best' ratio.Valves have a much larger impact on the performance of a gun then the ratios,if you were to open a 50mm ball valve and vent a chamber of say 1000cc into a barrel off 1000cc so the ratio of 1:1 you would get a velocity of X from the projectile,use the same chamber same barrel same projectile and pressure but use a 3/4 QEV that open in milliseconds and you would have a higher increase in velocity.
Ratios have very little to do with the power achieved and the efficiency of a launcher.
Ratios have very little to do with the power achieved and the efficiency of a launcher.

At normal pressures, the "best" C:B ratio for pneumatics is around 0.2:1.
Obviously however, increasing chamber size will always increase performance. The .2:1 ratio assumes a fixed chamber size.
Please, download GGDT and save yourself the trouble of posting topics like these. I really don't know how people even design pneumatics without it.
Obviously however, increasing chamber size will always increase performance. The .2:1 ratio assumes a fixed chamber size.
Please, download GGDT and save yourself the trouble of posting topics like these. I really don't know how people even design pneumatics without it.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
- bigbob12345
- Staff Sergeant

- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:13 am
- Location: Mercer Island,Washington
And what would normal pressures be. Ive always heard the ideal ratio is 4:1 but I could be wrong.And your all right that the ratio hardly matters at all it is mostly just the valve flow and opening speed that matters so dont worry about the ratio just get a really good valve
-
Novacastrian
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:59 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
You are right that you are wrong.bigbob12345 wrote:And what would normal pressures be. Ive always heard the ideal ratio is 4:1 but I could be wrong.And your all right that the ratio hardly matters at all it is mostly just the valve flow and opening speed that matters so dont worry about the ratio just get a really good valve
C:B ratios differ from person to person, it's a never ending argument.
America, the greatest gangster of all time. With 200 million odd foot soldiers at it's whim and call.
When you fill your car with refined oil remember that it has been paid for with blood and guts, some from your own countrymen, most not.
When you fill your car with refined oil remember that it has been paid for with blood and guts, some from your own countrymen, most not.
The 4:1 thing assumes a fixed barrel size for some reason. It is near the point where the diminishing returns make increasing the chamber size any more pointless. But really, by increasing chamber size over 1:1, all you're doing is wasting gas. By normal pressures, I meant what your average compressor or bike pump can put out, no more than 160 psi. At these pressures, around 0.2:1 IS the perfect C:B ratio, assuming a fixed chamber size (which it usually is). There is no debate otherwise, because a larger chamber will always mean increased performance for a given barrel.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
Rna_duelers the 50 millimeter might offer better performance only because the ball valve has a bigger flow rate even though it opens faster. But essentially you are right. it all depends on the cannon design. I kno i had a time where a 3/4 inch ball valve performed better for me than a 3/4 sprinkler.
4SPC, My 4" piston 3" porting cannon
Memo:
Fix up copper cannon
Fix up 4SPC
Start Stirrup pump
Start Toolies piston bazooka
Memo:
Fix up copper cannon
Fix up 4SPC
Start Stirrup pump
Start Toolies piston bazooka
i think someone should do some experiments using a basic inline pneumatic, altering the c:b to to every whole number like 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, and use the same modded sprinkler in every test, just so we could get some baseline data for the C:B ratio debate. not me...way too expensive :munky2: ... monkeh!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
You can model it with GGDT to give you a rought idea of performance. In general, bigger chamber = better performance and more noise. By how much performance actually improves however depends on your valve, barrel length etc. - again, model it in GGDT to get an idea before you build.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- ALIHISGREAT
- Staff Sergeant 3

- Posts: 1778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:47 pm
- Location: UK
there is not really much point because the general rule is to put on a barrel as long as you can and uness you have a tiny chamber it should always give an increase in performance (although it may only be small) because in most pneumatics air is not exactly wasted but not used to its full potential because a few fps could be gained by having a longer barrel.Eddbot wrote:i think someone should do some experiments using a basic inline pneumatic, altering the c:b to to every whole number like 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, and use the same modded sprinkler in every test, just so we could get some baseline data for the C:B ratio debate. not me...way too expensive :munky2: ... monkeh!
i think the most efficient chamber barrel ratio for a pneumatic would all depend on your pressure you're gonna run. a 1:1 ratio would be most efficient if you were running at twice the atmospheric pressure would it not?? As Far as most powerful it doesn't freaking matter. power that damn thing up and launch some spuds!!!!!!
<a href="">DONT TAZE ME BRO.. DONT TAZE ME... AHHHH</a>Yea, that's definitely going to get you at least a tazer.
facebook.com/biggrib
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 5 Replies
- 2199 Views
-
Last post by dart guy
-
- 3 Replies
- 2618 Views
-
Last post by Scotty
-
- 1 Replies
- 1326 Views
-
Last post by MrCrowley
-
- 0 Replies
- 3623 Views
-
Last post by PhoenixFire
-
- 2 Replies
- 1541 Views
-
Last post by natas







