Piston Valve Design

Cannons powered by pneumatic pressure (compressed gas) using a valve or other release.
User avatar
daberno123
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 594
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Ohio

This is the design I came up with for a valve on my cannon after getting the basic principals down about a piston valve. The design was based on the idea of a sprinkler valve that has the plastic circle attached to it to make it more efficient. I would probably put it in a 2" tee. Tell me if you think it will work.

I was thinking about using 1/16" sheet pvc
I might use some insulation for a bumper
I might pilot the valve with my 1" sprinkler valve, but I'm not sure if that would help much compared to just a blowgun
The spring would be one that I got out of a rod that holds the toilet paper
I have an old bicycle tube that I would use to help it seal

This is a video of my current cannon at 80 psi with a sprinkler valve

[youtube][/youtube]
Attachments
A picture of my launcher
A picture of my launcher
11-02-07_1727.jpg (33.08 KiB) Viewed 3072 times
Description of valve
Description of valve
Slide1.JPG
Slide1.JPG (29.17 KiB) Viewed 3072 times
Slide2.JPG
Slide2.JPG (29.81 KiB) Viewed 3072 times
Slide3.JPG
Slide3.JPG (29.83 KiB) Viewed 3072 times
Slide4.JPG
Slide4.JPG (32.72 KiB) Viewed 3072 times
User avatar
Zen///
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:49 pm
Location: In a foxhole sniping,Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Nice, I love the barrel support.

DMW!?!?!?

SCRAP THAT DEATH TRAP!
Last edited by Zen/// on Sun Nov 25, 2007 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
VH_man
Staff Sergeant 4
Staff Sergeant 4
Posts: 1827
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Been thanked: 1 time

I spy DWV......... Replace the bell reducers on your chamber.......... before they explode.......
User avatar
BC Pneumatics
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1053
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Fresno, CA
Contact:

VH_man wrote:I spy DWV......... Replace the bell reducers on your chamber.......... before they explode.......
VH_man is right, that cannon is more dangerous than it has to be.
User avatar
JDP12
Staff Sergeant 5
Staff Sergeant 5
Posts: 1943
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:34 pm

ditto on the DWV.. i was about to mention that
"Some say his pet elephant is pink, and that he has no understanding of "PG rated forum". All we know is, he's called JSR. "
User avatar
daberno123
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 594
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Ohio

I already know about the dwv and I'm going to replace it
What about the valve design?

I just checked the price of 4x2 bushings and they are $15 a piece!! Any cheaper suggestions?
Killjoy
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1052
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:51 am
Location: New Mexico

I like the valve design, looks like an inline-piston valve. It might be hard to build it though (but isn't everything the first time around), but the main problem I see is trying to get the mid-wall and piston to seal since the inside of a tee is round. Its possible, but it would be easier, more reliable (probably), and more durable if you just built a normal piston valve.

But give it a shot, would be pretty awesome if it worked.
Stanford Class of 2012

"In the end our society will be defined not only by what we create, but what we refuse to destroy"- John Sawhill
User avatar
Maniac
Specialist 4
Specialist 4
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:55 pm
Location: Right behind you

nice gun scrap than dwv noe also what is up with all the couplers
Coodude26 wrote:
People who laugh really hard at stuff that pisses you off/you getting hurt, who then say "I'm sorry, I can't stop" but you know they easily could.

Mr.C: That's not as easy as you think. It's like me kicking you in the balls and telling you to stop crying.
User avatar
BC Pneumatics
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1053
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Fresno, CA
Contact:

daberno123 wrote:I already know about the dwv and I'm going to replace it
What about the valve design?

I just checked the price of 4x2 bushings and they are $15 a piece!! Any cheaper suggestions?
No. That is the cost of safety.
User avatar
mopherman
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

looks great. loose the reducers and it'l be good for 120 psi. BTW, I love bad religion. props on the music
searching for a modern day savior from another place,inclined toward charity,everyone's begging for an answer,without regard to validity,the searching never ends,it goes on and on for eternity
-Bad religion
User avatar
daberno123
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 594
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Ohio

what is up with all the couplers
I adapted that piece from my first gun to make it level with the barrel support
the main problem I see is trying to get the mid-wall and piston to seal since the inside of a tee is round.
The top part of the piston would be a disk of sheet pvc and the part coming down woud be a rectangular piece of sheet pvc glued to the bottom of the disk
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26219
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 347 times

I like your launcher, though the length of your hose gave me a mild cardiac arrest and as to the position of the sprinkler valve, see attachment ;)

Your design looks like it would work though not any better than a coaxial piston valve, looks like an excess complication personally but hey, if you want to make something different, go for it :D
Attachments
11_02_07_1727_295.jpg
11_02_07_1727_295.jpg (22.56 KiB) Viewed 2974 times
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10078
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Been thanked: 3 times

Also with JSR's recomendations, having your valve where it is, isn't good for the flow, the air has to do a 180 degree turn before getting to the projectile, it also puts more stress on the joints.
User avatar
Pilgrimman
Specialist 4
Specialist 4
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:10 pm
Location: Grants Pass, OR

I second JSR's post. I loaded my gun one time, but forgot to ram it down to the breech. What I got was a flying potato that would have flown further if I had thrown it! This was at 100 psi, mind you! Move the valve to the breech, and you will see an increase in performance.

As to the valve idea, it's certainly interesting, and I'd encourage you to try it, but I think, conceptually, that traditional piston valves will perform better 1. because they don't restrict flow (much), and 2. They don't have bends that cause the gasses to lose energy (Other than the 90 degrees from chamber to barrel, and this is almost infinitesimal). One advantage I do see is that the moving portion is considerably lighter than most pistons, but this advantage is countered by the force of the spring closing the valve, (If, as I assume, it is pressing the valve down), and the weight issue for traditional pistons can be remedied.

Again it's still interesting. Try it! I've been wrong before! (In case you were wondering! :D )
Yeah, we wouldn't want to anger the bees, now would we??

I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES!

LMAO Classic!!!! I love Family Guy!
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26219
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 347 times

The dual chambers are also a little large in comparison to the barrel volume, using just one would make your launcher quieter, easier to pressurise and the performance loss would not be that dramatic.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post