This is the design I came up with for a valve on my cannon after getting the basic principals down about a piston valve. The design was based on the idea of a sprinkler valve that has the plastic circle attached to it to make it more efficient. I would probably put it in a 2" tee. Tell me if you think it will work.
I was thinking about using 1/16" sheet pvc
I might use some insulation for a bumper
I might pilot the valve with my 1" sprinkler valve, but I'm not sure if that would help much compared to just a blowgun
The spring would be one that I got out of a rod that holds the toilet paper
I have an old bicycle tube that I would use to help it seal
This is a video of my current cannon at 80 psi with a sprinkler valve
[youtube][/youtube]
Piston Valve Design
- daberno123
- Corporal

- Posts: 594
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Zen///
- Specialist 2

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:49 pm
- Location: In a foxhole sniping,Calgary, Canada
- Contact:
Nice, I love the barrel support.
DMW!?!?!?
SCRAP THAT DEATH TRAP!
DMW!?!?!?
SCRAP THAT DEATH TRAP!
Last edited by Zen/// on Sun Nov 25, 2007 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Copper burst disk cannon
4000psi shot
The burst disk "rifle" (not rick roll)
Currently away playing ps3
4000psi shot
The burst disk "rifle" (not rick roll)
Currently away playing ps3
- BC Pneumatics
- Sergeant

- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Fresno, CA
- Contact:
VH_man is right, that cannon is more dangerous than it has to be.VH_man wrote:I spy DWV......... Replace the bell reducers on your chamber.......... before they explode.......
<a href="http://www.bcarms.com/"><img src="http://www.bcarms.com/images/store_logo.png" border="0"> </a>
- daberno123
- Corporal

- Posts: 594
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Ohio
I already know about the dwv and I'm going to replace it
What about the valve design?
I just checked the price of 4x2 bushings and they are $15 a piece!! Any cheaper suggestions?
What about the valve design?
I just checked the price of 4x2 bushings and they are $15 a piece!! Any cheaper suggestions?
I like the valve design, looks like an inline-piston valve. It might be hard to build it though (but isn't everything the first time around), but the main problem I see is trying to get the mid-wall and piston to seal since the inside of a tee is round. Its possible, but it would be easier, more reliable (probably), and more durable if you just built a normal piston valve.
But give it a shot, would be pretty awesome if it worked.
But give it a shot, would be pretty awesome if it worked.
Stanford Class of 2012
"In the end our society will be defined not only by what we create, but what we refuse to destroy"- John Sawhill
"In the end our society will be defined not only by what we create, but what we refuse to destroy"- John Sawhill
nice gun scrap than dwv noe also what is up with all the couplers
Coodude26 wrote:
People who laugh really hard at stuff that pisses you off/you getting hurt, who then say "I'm sorry, I can't stop" but you know they easily could.
Mr.C: That's not as easy as you think. It's like me kicking you in the balls and telling you to stop crying.
People who laugh really hard at stuff that pisses you off/you getting hurt, who then say "I'm sorry, I can't stop" but you know they easily could.
Mr.C: That's not as easy as you think. It's like me kicking you in the balls and telling you to stop crying.
- BC Pneumatics
- Sergeant

- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Fresno, CA
- Contact:
No. That is the cost of safety.daberno123 wrote:I already know about the dwv and I'm going to replace it
What about the valve design?
I just checked the price of 4x2 bushings and they are $15 a piece!! Any cheaper suggestions?
<a href="http://www.bcarms.com/"><img src="http://www.bcarms.com/images/store_logo.png" border="0"> </a>
looks great. loose the reducers and it'l be good for 120 psi. BTW, I love bad religion. props on the music
searching for a modern day savior from another place,inclined toward charity,everyone's begging for an answer,without regard to validity,the searching never ends,it goes on and on for eternity
-Bad religion
-Bad religion
- daberno123
- Corporal

- Posts: 594
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Ohio
I adapted that piece from my first gun to make it level with the barrel supportwhat is up with all the couplers
The top part of the piston would be a disk of sheet pvc and the part coming down woud be a rectangular piece of sheet pvc glued to the bottom of the diskthe main problem I see is trying to get the mid-wall and piston to seal since the inside of a tee is round.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
I like your launcher, though the length of your hose gave me a mild cardiac arrest and as to the position of the sprinkler valve, see attachment 
Your design looks like it would work though not any better than a coaxial piston valve, looks like an excess complication personally but hey, if you want to make something different, go for it
Your design looks like it would work though not any better than a coaxial piston valve, looks like an excess complication personally but hey, if you want to make something different, go for it
- Attachments
-
- 11_02_07_1727_295.jpg (22.56 KiB) Viewed 2967 times
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- MrCrowley
- Moderator

- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
Also with JSR's recomendations, having your valve where it is, isn't good for the flow, the air has to do a 180 degree turn before getting to the projectile, it also puts more stress on the joints.
- Pilgrimman
- Specialist 4

- Posts: 480
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:10 pm
- Location: Grants Pass, OR
I second JSR's post. I loaded my gun one time, but forgot to ram it down to the breech. What I got was a flying potato that would have flown further if I had thrown it! This was at 100 psi, mind you! Move the valve to the breech, and you will see an increase in performance.
As to the valve idea, it's certainly interesting, and I'd encourage you to try it, but I think, conceptually, that traditional piston valves will perform better 1. because they don't restrict flow (much), and 2. They don't have bends that cause the gasses to lose energy (Other than the 90 degrees from chamber to barrel, and this is almost infinitesimal). One advantage I do see is that the moving portion is considerably lighter than most pistons, but this advantage is countered by the force of the spring closing the valve, (If, as I assume, it is pressing the valve down), and the weight issue for traditional pistons can be remedied.
Again it's still interesting. Try it! I've been wrong before! (In case you were wondering!
)
As to the valve idea, it's certainly interesting, and I'd encourage you to try it, but I think, conceptually, that traditional piston valves will perform better 1. because they don't restrict flow (much), and 2. They don't have bends that cause the gasses to lose energy (Other than the 90 degrees from chamber to barrel, and this is almost infinitesimal). One advantage I do see is that the moving portion is considerably lighter than most pistons, but this advantage is countered by the force of the spring closing the valve, (If, as I assume, it is pressing the valve down), and the weight issue for traditional pistons can be remedied.
Again it's still interesting. Try it! I've been wrong before! (In case you were wondering!
Yeah, we wouldn't want to anger the bees, now would we??
I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES!
LMAO Classic!!!! I love Family Guy!
I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES! I HATE YOU BEES!
LMAO Classic!!!! I love Family Guy!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
The dual chambers are also a little large in comparison to the barrel volume, using just one would make your launcher quieter, easier to pressurise and the performance loss would not be that dramatic.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 25 Replies
- 8011 Views
-
Last post by spudlicker2x
-
- 68 Replies
- 14727 Views
-
Last post by DonTheLegend
-
- 18 Replies
- 6880 Views
-
Last post by penquin
-
- 3 Replies
- 1428 Views
-
Last post by CS
-
- 9 Replies
- 2152 Views
-
Last post by Gun Freak



